The Digest
Edition 6
February 07, 2026  ·  3 stories  ·  ~2 min read
Public example

Built from today's real top stories across a fixed sample topic mix. Signed-up users receive fully personalised daily digests.

Top Story Early

16 AI Agents Collaboratively Built Functional C Compiler

What Happened
Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini used 16 instances of Claude Opus 4.6 AI model to collaboratively build a C compiler from scratch over two weeks. The AI agents worked autonomously in separate Docker containers, sharing a Git repository and claiming tasks independently without central coordination, at a cost of about $20,000 in API fees. The project resulted in a 100,000-line Rust-based compiler capable of building a bootable Linux 6.9 kernel across multiple architectures (x86, ARM, and RISC-V). The compiler achieved a 99 percent pass rate on industry standard tests and can compile major open source projects including PostgreSQL, SQLite, and Redis.
Why It Matters
This experiment demonstrates the potential of multi-agent AI systems to tackle complex software development tasks collaboratively, coinciding with both Anthropic and OpenAI launching multi-agent tools. The project showcases AI's ability to work autonomously on well-defined technical problems with existing specifications and test suites. However, the experiment highlights important limitations of current AI coding capabilities - C compiler development represents an ideal scenario with decades-old specifications, comprehensive existing tests, and reference implementations for validation. Most real-world software projects lack these advantages, and the greater challenge in development typically involves determining requirements and designing appropriate tests rather than writing code to pass existing tests.

Penis Enhancement Scandal Rocks Olympic Ski JumpingDeveloping

What Happened
Male ski jumpers are allegedly using penis fillers to gain competitive advantages at the 2026 Winter Olympics. The scheme involves injecting hyaluronic acid or paraffin to increase bulge size during mandatory 3D body scans, which determines jumpsuit fabric allocation. Larger crotch areas provide more surface area for improved aerodynamics—simulations show 2 cm of extra fabric can increase lift by 5% and add 5.8 meters to jumps. This follows a 2024 scandal where Norwegian Olympic medalists and coaches were suspended for illegally enlarging suit crotch areas through restitching.
Analysis
Why It Matters
The allegations expose extreme lengths athletes may pursue for marginal performance gains in precision sports where millimeters matter. Medical experts warn that such injections carry health risks and lack medical justification. The scandal highlights gaps in anti-doping oversight, as enhancement methods that don't involve prohibited substances fall outside WADA's jurisdiction. The controversy threatens ski jumping's reputation and may force rule changes governing equipment regulations and body modification procedures.
Uncertainty
The penis injection allegations remain unverified rumors based on "whispers" reported by German media, with no confirmed cases or official investigations announced. WADA officials stated they were unaware of any formal claims when questioned, though promised to investigate.

Judge Dismisses Case Over Lawyer's AI AbuseEarly

What Happened
New York federal judge Katherine Polk Failla terminated a case this week due to attorney Steven Feldman's repeated misuse of AI when drafting court filings. Feldman's AI-generated documents contained fake citations and conspicuously florid prose that was stylistically inconsistent with his other work. When asked to correct his filings, Feldman continued submitting documents with fabricated legal citations. One filing notably included an extended quote from Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451" and metaphors comparing legal advocacy to gardening, while another invoked biblical passages about divine judgment.
Analysis
Why It Matters
This case represents what the judge called a "new standard for abuse of AI" in legal practice, highlighting growing concerns about attorneys using artificial intelligence tools without proper oversight. The termination of an entire case due to AI misuse marks an escalation in judicial sanctions against lawyers who submit AI-generated content containing fabricated citations. The ruling underscores the legal profession's struggle to adapt to AI tools while maintaining professional standards and the integrity of court proceedings. It sends a strong message to attorneys about their responsibility to verify AI-generated content before submitting it to courts.

One story that deserves more attention today.

Penis Enhancement Scandal Rocks Olympic Ski JumpingDeveloping

What Happened
Male ski jumpers are allegedly using penis fillers to gain competitive advantages at the 2026 Winter Olympics. The scheme involves injecting hyaluronic acid or paraffin to increase bulge size during mandatory 3D body scans, which determines jumpsuit fabric allocation. Larger crotch areas provide more surface area for improved aerodynamics—simulations show 2 cm of extra fabric can increase lift by 5% and add 5.8 meters to jumps. This follows a 2024 scandal where Norwegian Olympic medalists and coaches were suspended for illegally enlarging suit crotch areas through restitching.
Analysis
Why It Matters
The allegations expose extreme lengths athletes may pursue for marginal performance gains in precision sports where millimeters matter. Medical experts warn that such injections carry health risks and lack medical justification. The scandal highlights gaps in anti-doping oversight, as enhancement methods that don't involve prohibited substances fall outside WADA's jurisdiction. The controversy threatens ski jumping's reputation and may force rule changes governing equipment regulations and body modification procedures.
Uncertainty
The penis injection allegations remain unverified rumors based on "whispers" reported by German media, with no confirmed cases or official investigations announced. WADA officials stated they were unaware of any formal claims when questioned, though promised to investigate.